Mark sent you an exclusive invite to invest with Cache.
When you sign up for Cache using Mark's unique referral link, you both get $100,000 managed free for one year.
Got it

Tax‑Aware Long-Short Investing, Explained

A clear, practical guide for the general investor
No items found.

Introduction

A tax-aware long-short strategy (sometimes called “long-short direct indexing” or “130/30”) is a way to magnify tax-loss harvesting. Margin borrowing and short sales are used to put additional dollars to work with loss-generating expectations, while the overall portfolio continues to track a broad market index. Realized capital losses can offset capital gains elsewhere in the portfolio.

In simple terms, a long-short manager borrows against your portfolio and invests more in the market. A nearly equal dollar amount is sold short (a bet against the market) so that your overall market exposure stays at 100%.

In a 130/30 setup, an investor deposits $100 of cash and stocks into the account. The manager borrows $30 to buy more stocks (the “long” leg). Another $30 of stocks is borrowed and sold to the market (the “short” leg), with the cash proceeds held in escrow. Net exposure is still $100 ($100 + $30 − $30), but gross exposure rises to $160. The extra $60 is used to enhance tax-loss harvesting without changing the investment objective.

Example provided for illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of any specific scenario, actual allocations will vary based on holdings.

Executed properly, this structure is designed to counterbalance the added risks of leverage while generating additional tax losses, ideally even in calm or rising markets.

Research shows that tax-aware long-short can generate significantly higher tax losses than traditional direct indexing.1 Investors, however, need to understand the higher risk from leverage, the difficulty of managing shorts well, and the eventual tax realization required when moving from a long-short portfolio back to a long-only or un-leveraged one.

The Problem: “Portfolio Lock‑In” with Direct Indexing

Over long horizons, markets tend to rise. In a standard direct indexing account, this means harvestable losses gradually shrink. After the first few years, most positions sit at a net gain, so realized losses decline and eventually level off.

In large-sample simulations, cumulative net realized losses for long-only direct indexing climb early and then flatten near roughly 30% of initial capital. Year-one loss rates are the highest, then they fall steadily until the portfolio becomes “locked in” or “ossified.”

At that point, the direct indexing engine is doing very little for you. You are still paying (usually higher) fees, but one of the core benefits, a reliable stream of losses, has likely faded.

Source: AQR Research

The Basics You Should Know

What is tax-loss harvesting?

The U.S. tax code allows taxpayers to deduct capital losses from capital gains realized during the tax year. Short-term gains net with short-term losses; long-term gains net with long-term losses; then the two buckets net against each other. You are taxed on net profits, not gross trades.

If you end the year with a net capital loss, you can deduct up to $3,000 of that loss against ordinary income ($1,500 if married filing separately) and carry forward the rest to future years until it’s fully exhausted.

What is direct indexing?

Direct indexing is a systematic approach to harvest tax losses from your portfolio while tracking a broad market index. Instead of owning a fund that replicates the index, you own the individual stocks that reflect the index in a separately managed account. As markets fluctuate, the manager can recognize losses in positions that have fallen below their purchase price and replace them with similar exposures to ensure you’re fully invested (while adhering to the IRS wash-sale rule). For an in-depth understanding, read our comprehensive guide to direct indexing.

What is shorting?

Shorting (a short sale) is selling a stock you don’t own because you expect its price to fall. It is also used to offset portfolio risk. You borrow some shares, sell them, and later buy them back to return them to the lender. If the price has dropped, you keep the difference after costs; if it has risen, you take a loss. Shorting requires a margin account and comes with specific costs: an ongoing borrow fee to rent the shares, and ongoing dividend replacement payments. You can also face operational risks, such as a lender recalling shares and forcing you to close the position prematurely.

Shorting carries distinct risks. As a stock can keep rising indefinitely, potential losses on a short are theoretically unlimited. Position sizing and risk controls matter. For taxes, gains or losses on the short sale are usually recognized when you close the position, and many short-sale outcomes are treated as short-term; the exact treatment depends on timing and the shares used to close the trade.

Shorting in a tax-aware long-short strategy

In the context of this article, shorts serve as the counterweight that keeps your net exposure around 100% after the manager borrows a small amount to add extra long exposure (e.g., a 130/30 strategy). That counterweight allows the account to invest more dollars on both the long and short sides, creating more opportunities to realize tax losses even when markets are rising. Generally, short exposure is the engine that’s expected to generate losses while keeping borrowing costs low, containing the risk, and avoiding tax issues such as constructive sales.

A simple analogy: think of a well-structured fitness program. You build muscle with targeted training (the extra long exposure) and shed fat with disciplined nutrition (the short book). Your overall weight stays similar, but the total activity helps you reach your goals, as long as the program is well designed.

Step‑by‑step

  1. Fund the brokerage account. Deposit stocks, index funds, or cash. Assume $1 million for this example.
  2. Borrow on portfolio margin. The manager uses your $1 million as collateral to borrow $300,000 (for a 130/30 structure that is 30% of the account).
  3. Buy long and sell short. The manager buys a diversified basket of stocks for $300,000 and sells short an equal amount, keeping net market exposure near the original $1 million, with gross exposure of about $1.6 million.
  4. Continuously harvest. In rising markets, shorts lose value. In falling markets, longs lose value. Individual stocks that move differently from the market may also create losses. When specific lots fall below their purchase price, the manager realizes the loss and swaps into similar but not “substantially identical” stocks to maintain exposure while following IRS wash-sale rules.
  5. Rinse and repeat. New lots are created regularly on both sides, keeping the pool of harvestable losses replenished.

Where the Tax Value Comes From

  1. Volatility and dispersion: Even in strong years, many stocks are down at any point in time. The long-short overlay increases the number of stocks and dollars that pass through loss-harvest screens.
  2. Fresh basis: New long and short trades create new purchase prices. More fresh lots mean more chances to harvest as prices move.
  3. Term management: Skilled managers try to realize losses and defer gains, and to tilt any realized gains toward long-term treatment when possible.
  4. Persistence: Because new lots are constantly created, loss capacity does not deteriorate after two to three years. This directly addresses the lock-in problem seen in long-only direct indexing.

What the Tax Code Cares About

  1. Economic Substance
    The tax code disallows transactions undertaken solely for tax benefits, without an economic substance. In this strategy, additional longs and shorts could be questioned if they exist only to generate losses. A robust program has meaningful pre-tax objectives. A “long-short direct indexing” provider that promises very low tracking error relative to the benchmark may invite scrutiny about economic substance.

  2. Wash‑Sale Rule (the 30‑day window)
    If you sell a security at a loss and buy the same or a “substantially identical” security 30 days before or after, the loss is disallowed and added to the basis of the replacement shares. Managers avoid this by using close substitutes rather than identical securities and by coordinating across household accounts. IRS Publication 550 gives examples and guidance. Some investments that track the same index can be considered “substantially identical” in practice.

  3. Constructive Sales
    If you own a low-basis stock in any account and short the same stock, the IRS may treat it as if you sold the stock and you may owe capital gains immediately. A disciplined manager avoids “shorting against the box” across the whole household.

  4. Short‑Sale and Margin Tax Items

Payments in lieu of dividends. When you short a dividend-paying stock, you compensate the lender for the dividend. These substitute payments are generally not dividends to you and may be treated as ordinary income to the recipient. Your ability to deduct them follows specific timing tests (for example, short held at least 46 days to deduct as investment interest).

Margin interest. Interest paid to borrow for investments is usually investment interest expense. It is deductible up to your net investment income, and any unused amount can carry forward.

Costs and Frictions to Consider

Tax-aware long-short strategies involve several costs and frictions:

  1. Management and trading costs. You pay a manager to run a complex Separately Managed Account (SMA) with regular trading, compliance, and reporting.
  2. Financing costs. Margin interest on the borrowed “extra” longs, usually a spread over short-term rates. Institutional managers may negotiate tighter spreads. Rebates from shorts can offset part of this cost.
  3. Stock-borrow fees. Fees on the short side vary by security and by supply and demand in the lending market. “Hard-to-borrow” names can be expensive or temporarily unavailable.
  4. Dividend economics on shorts. If a shorted company pays a dividend, you owe a payment in lieu to the lender. These payments differ from ordinary dividends and you should expect cash drawn from your portfolio for them.
  5. Exit costs. Once you have harvested substantial losses, you may want to reduce leverage and risk. Exiting a long-short strategy requires careful planning over multiple years and will eventually lead to realizing a meaningful capital gain.

An experienced manager will try to optimize cost efficiency by capping borrow-fee exposure, avoiding perennially expensive shorts, staggering lot creation to maximize dispersion, and modeling after-tax outcomes net of financing.

Risks You Need to Understand Carefully

  • Pre-tax underperformance risk. By their nature long-short strategy are typically an active strategy. Active stock selection creates tracking errors that can underperform the market. Many long-short approaches use factor tilts or style biases that can shift portfolio behavior over time.
  • Leverage and shorting risk. Borrowing against your portfolio exposes you to margin calls if collateral falls. Shorts expose you to potentially large losses if a stock keeps rising. Short squeezes can create rapid losses.
  • Wash-sale mistakes. Buying back too soon or choosing a “substantially identical” replacement can disallow a loss and shift basis instead.
  • Constructive sale risk. Shorting a stock you already own with a large embedded gain, even in another account, can trigger current-year taxation. Household-level controls are essential.
  • Exit risk. Unwinding the overlay forces you to realize deferred gains. Research suggests you can often de-risk gradually over several years and keep much of the benefit, but a full return to unlevered long-only usually recognizes meaningful gains. You will need liquidity elsewhere.
  • Manager risk. The strategy is complex and nuanced. Choosing an experienced manager with a sound, documented process is critical.
  • Tax-law risk. The approach depends on current rules for loss harvesting and the use of leverage. The economic substance doctrine can challenge a program that mainly targets additional losses through leverage.

When You May Want to ConsiderThis Strategy

A tax-aware long-short SMA is particularly powerful around major financial events, when you need losses to offset gains and manage transitions. Potential use cases include:

  • Revitalizing an existing direct indexing portfolio that has few losses left.
  • Preparing for a company sale or other large liquidity event.
  • Offsetting gains from the sale of appreciated real estate.
  • Managing tax exposure when repositioning inherited assets with low basis.
  • Diversifying a concentrated stock position while hedging risk during the transition.
  • Pre-IPO planning to build up realized losses before an IPO unlock.

How Much of Your Portfolio Should You Allocate?

One way to think about this is to use a simple framing: your “loss demand” versus the strategy’s “loss capacity.”

  1. Estimate your loss demand.
    Add realized capital gains this year to gains you expect over the next one to three years. That is the total loss you can actually use.

  2. Pick an intensity that matches demand and risk comfort.

While you should consider your own risk tolerance and work with an Advisor if you need help below are some potential options

  • Less Leverage. Allocate 5–10% of taxable equities to a 130/30 program. You are learning the mechanics and covering part of expected gains.
  • Moderate. Allocate 10–20% to a 130/30 or 150/50 program if gains are steady and you accept some factor and leverage exposure.
  • Aggressive. Allocate 20–30% or more with higher extensions (for example 150/50 or above) if you expect large, recurring gains and can tolerate more complexity and risk.

  1. Calibrate with ranges, not point estimates.
    Ask your manager for historical ranges of realized losses by leverage level and benchmark, net of financing and borrow fees. Peer-reviewed research shows clear advantages for long-short versus direct indexing, but outcomes vary. Size the allocation toward the middle of the range that matches your demand, then adjust using real results from your first six to twelve months.

A tax-aware long-short SMA can be funded with many liquid, marketable assets, including publicly traded stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, fixed income, and cash. 

In most situations, private company stock, unvested RSUs, unexercised options, and highly illiquid positions are not eligible.

If a large share of your wealth is in a single low-basis stock, coordinate the long-short overlay with a plan for that position, such as an exchange fund, charitable gifts, or staged sales. Avoid constructive-sale conflicts.

The Exit (Plan This on Day One)

At some point, you may want less complexity or less financing exposure. An orderly glide path can reduce leverage and tracking error over several years, preserving much of the benefit while avoiding a single large gain. A full unwind back to a pure long-only portfolio will generally recognize meaningful gains, so the goal is to control timing, not avoid taxes forever.

Takeaway

If your portfolio is generating substantial capital gains, whether from selling a concentrated position, secondary sales of private stock, partnership distributions, real estate sales, or a future liquidity event, a tax-aware long-short SMA can be a powerful tool to alleviate tax liabilities. The strength of the strategy lies in replenishing “loss inventory” year after year.

Done well, it is a disciplined, rules-driven overlay that trades complexity for a clearer tax picture. Done poorly, it is an unnecessary cost and compliance risk that can drag on performance.

For sophisticated but time-constrained investors, it is worth starting in a measured way, insisting on institutional-quality processes around wash-sales and constructive sales, requiring transparent after-tax reporting, and sizing the allocation to your actual gain stream, not to marketing claims.

Sources

This article is for education only, not tax, legal, or investment advice. Results vary depending on the market, tax status, and implementation details. Consult your tax advisor and read the manager’s documents carefully.

Disclosure

Securities are offered through Cache Securities LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services are provided by Cache Advisors LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser to the Cache Exchange Funds. Both entities are under the common control of Cache Financials, Inc., collectively referred to as “Cache.” Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.  95 Third St, Floor 2, San Francisco, CA 94103.  Cache Securities, LLC 921 Front St 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111

This article is for education only, not tax, legal, or investment advice. Results vary depending on the market, tax status, and implementation details. Consult your tax advisor and read the manager’s documents carefully. Cache does not currently offer long short SMA strategies and does not recommend any specific product or duration.

--

Disclosures

Cache Advisors, LLC (Cache) is an investment adviser registered with the SEC. This article is for education only, not tax, legal, or investment advice. Results vary depending on the market, tax status, and implementation details. Consult your tax advisor and read the manager’s documents carefully. Cache does not currently offer long short SMA strategies and does not recommend any specific product or duration.

Diversify your stocks without a giant tax bill
Over $100k in a single stock?
The Cache Exchange Fund can help.
Learn more
Borrow for life’s big moments
See how the Cache Collar Advance can help you access liquidity.
Check it out

Make better decisions for managing your large stock positions.

Sign up to receive all our insights and data.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
CEF I vs Nasdaq 100 Net Performance
Inception to End of 2024

Detailed Info

Cache Exchange Fund I
25.1%
Nasdaq-100 Index
17.4%
Outperformance
+7.7%
Sharpe Ratio Net Performance Fund
Inception to End of Year 2024

Detailed Info

Cache Exchange Funds avg.
1.43
Nasdaq-100 Index
.73
Net Tracking Error (TE) All Funds vs Nasdaq-100
Inception to End of 2024

Detailed Info

Goal
2% – 4%
Realized
3.8% – 3.9%

More detailed information

Cache Exchange Fund I, LLC (incepted March 8, 2024) returned 25.1% (vs. 17.4% for the Nasdaq-100 Index), outperforming by 7.7% returns net of fees since inception

Cache Exchange Fund - GNU, LLC (incepted June 30, 2024) returned 18.1% (vs. 7.2%  for the Nasdaq-100 Index), outperforming by 10.9%. returns net of fees since inception.

Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC (incepted August 30, 2024) returned 16.3% (vs. 7.6% for the Nasdaq-100), outperforming by 8.7%. returns net of fees since inception.

More detailed information

Cache Exchange Fund I, LLC: 1.44 (vs. 1.03 for the Nasdaq-100 Index)

Cache Exchange Fund - GNU, LLC: 1.44 (vs. 0.54 for the Nasdaq-100 Index)

Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC: 1.40 (vs. 0.65  for the Nasdaq-100 Index)

More detailed information

Cache Exchange Fund I, LLC: 3.8%
Cache Exchange Fund - GNU, LLC: 3.9%
Cache Exchange Fund - Unix, LLC: 3.8%